Breitbart News, the conservative news and commentary site, has released a study that shows that digital advertising is far more expensive for the same brand of ads than traditional TV ads.
The study, commissioned by the Digital Advertising Alliance (DA), found that digital ads are three to four times more expensive to run compared to traditional TV ad campaigns.
In fact, digital ad spending is the equivalent of $1,800 per viewer for a typical TV ad, and that includes costs for content, marketing, data and content management.
“This is not news to most of us,” David Smith, CEO of the Digital Marketing Association (DMA), told Breitbart News.
“It’s something we’ve known for a while.
It’s what we’ve been doing.
It just seems that the media has not been paying attention.”
Digital advertising is the biggest category of ad spending by a wide margin.
According to the DMA study, digital ads cost $2.2 billion annually to run, and the average cost for a TV ad run is $1.6 billion.
The cost to run digital ads is not uniform across the entire industry.
For instance, the average digital ad costs $1 per viewer, and digital ads run on the web run for about $20 per viewer.
However, digital advertising costs far more than traditional ads, with digital ads running for about 10 times more.
The DMA report found that while digital advertising can cost more to run than traditional television ads, digital is significantly cheaper to run.
The average cost per viewer is $4.5 for digital ads compared to $1 for traditional TV advertising.
The average cost to operate a digital ad is $2 per viewer compared to an average of $9 for a traditional TV advertisement.
However the average per viewer cost for digital advertising compared to television advertising is significantly less than the cost for traditional television advertising.
As Smith explained, digital marketing is much more expensive than traditional marketing.
“In my opinion, digital media is not just about making a quick buck.
It is about getting the right message to the right audience,” he said.”
You need to get the right messaging across to the people that are going to purchase your product, you need to reach the right people, and you need the right advertisers to reach those people.
And you need advertisers to run your ads on those channels.”
Smith said digital advertising has a “great track record” and “people are taking notice of it.”
“I think it’s a great time to be in the advertising industry, and we are doing a great job of it,” he added.
The Digital Advertising Association is a nonprofit trade association that represents companies in the digital advertising industry.
The DMA is an industry association that promotes digital advertising as the best way to reach and engage people.
“The fact that we’re making more money from digital ads than we do from traditional TV shows shows, or movies, or television ads is just amazing,” Smith said.
“I think that’s just an amazing testament to the growth of the industry.”
Digital ads are still cheaper to produce than traditional advertising, but the average dollar spent on digital advertising will soon be less than traditional channels.
The most recent DMA digital advertising study found that the average amount of money that digital advertisers spend per viewer on digital ads has dropped to $0.75 compared to a year ago.
The digital ad market is also experiencing significant growth as new ad formats like AdMob, AdRoll and AdWords have become more popular.
Digital ads run more efficiently and with more granularity, but this is still a smaller portion of advertising spending than traditional media channels.
“We’re not saying we’re better at this, we’re saying that we are better at digital than traditional, and it’s really just a matter of what we’re doing to make sure that we have the right digital tools and the right technology,” Smith added.
“The way we’re advertising is really really just going to evolve as technology evolves.”
The study concluded that digital ad campaigns can provide a much higher return on investment than traditional campaigns.
“A campaign that takes 30 seconds to run is going to cost $0, and a campaign that runs on the internet for 20 minutes is going not only to cost you $0 but it’s going to take you an additional hour to run,” Smith explained.
“So it’s an extra $1 to run a digital campaign than a traditional campaign.”
In addition to the report, Smith explained that digital marketing has an advantage over traditional advertising.
“Digital advertising can be a better platform to run campaigns that don’t involve a lot of people.
It can also be a cheaper platform for a campaign, as long as you have the proper channels to support it,” Smith concluded.”
It’s really about having the right advertising and the correct platforms to get your message to a market that you want to reach.”
Smith added that he is hopeful that the rise of social media and the growing popularity of video on demand will bring digital advertising into parity with traditional TV.